• Doctor
  • GP practice

Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

234 Porters Avenue, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 2EQ

Provided and run by:
Omnes Healthcare Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 14 August 2025

Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery is a GP practice and delivers service to approximately 22,000 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The service has a branch site located in 79 Axe Street, Barking. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 67% White, 10% Asian, 18% Black, 4% Mixed, and 1% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the second decile (2 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people, and took decisions in people’s best interests where the person did not have capacity.

Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. However, some patients found the service was not always easy to access. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

People's experience of the service

Updated 14 August 2025

There was mixed feedback regarding how people felt about the quality of their care and treatment. Results from the 2025 National GP Patient Survey showed some service users were dissatisfied with services. For example, at the time, results showed that 70% of respondents to the survey stated the healthcare professional was good at listening to them during their last appointment, and 58% of patients responded positively to the overall experience of their GP practice. In response, the practice carried out their own survey, resulting in 194 patient responses, which showed increased satisfaction levels. For example, it showed that 80% of patients found reception staff helpful, 82% of patients reported a positive experience with staff, and 84% of patients felt listened to and understood during their last appointment. The practice did not, at the time of the inspection, have an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service.