• Doctor
  • GP practice

Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

234 Porters Avenue, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 2EQ

Provided and run by:
Omnes Healthcare Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery is a GP practice and delivers service to approximately 22,000 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The service has a branch site located in 79 Axe Street, Barking. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the practice area is 67% White, 10% Asian, 18% Black, 4% Mixed, and 1% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the second decile (2 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people, and took decisions in people’s best interests where the person did not have capacity.

Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. However, some patients found the service was not always easy to access. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

21 August 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive at Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery on 21 August 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Safe- Good.

Effective – Good.

Caring - Requires Improvement.

Responsive – Requires Improvement.

Well-led - Good.

Following our previous inspection on 28 March 2018, the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions except caring which was rated requires improvement.

The full report for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Porters Avenue Doctors Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection part of a random selection of services rated Good and Outstanding to test the reliability of our new monitoring approach which involved a site visit: We looked at the Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led key questions.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients level of satisfaction regarding accessing the practice and the way they were treated was significantly lower than local and national averages.
  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
  • The GP Patient survey results for the patient's access to the service was below national average.
  • Clinical searches found patients receiving high-risk medicines, such as methotrexate,received appropriate monitoring.
  • Staff were positive about the working at the practice.
  • The practice had implemented a new patient app to improve appointment access.
  • Patients were now offered same day appointments, if they coud not be seen on the same day, they would be seen the next day.
  • The practice was undertaking it’s own patient survey.
  • The system for the management of infection preventionand control was effective.
  • The systems for the management of risk in the premises was effective

We found one breach of regulation. The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue to improve the uptake for childhood immunisation and of cervical cancer screening.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care